Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informations­wissen­schaft

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informations­wissen­schaft | Von Uns | BBK | Abstracts | WS 20/21 | BBK: Certification Information on Trustworthy Digital Repository Websites: A Content Analysis

BBK: Certification Information on Trustworthy Digital Repository Websites: A Content Analysis

Berliner Bibliothekswissenschaftliches Kolloquium

12.01.2021 | 18 Uhr | ZOOM | Dorotheenstraße 26 | IBI

Certification Information on Trustworthy Digital Repository Websites: A Content Analysis

Dr. Devan Ray Donaldson, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering - Indiana University Bloomington, United States of America

 

 


Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag

 

In 1996, an international group of representatives from national archives and libraries, universities, industry, publishing offices, and other government and private sector organizations first articulated the need for certified Trustworthy Digital Repositories (TDRs). Henceforth, multiple standards for TDRs have developed worldwide and their reviewers provide third party audit of digital repositories. Even though hundreds of repositories are currently certified, we do not know if audit and certification of TDRs actually matters. For example, we do not know if digital repositories are actually better at preserving digital information after certification than they were before. Additionally, we do not know if TDRs preserve digital information better than their counterparts, although TDR standards definitely promulgate this assumption. One way of assessing whether audit and certification of TDRs matters is to study its impact on TDRs' stakeholders (e.g., funders, data producers, data consumers). As an initial critical step forward, this study examines what certification-related information repositories actually include on their websites since repository websites provide a means of disseminating information. Using findings from a content analysis of 91 TDR-certified repository websites, this research examines: 1) written statements about TDR status, 2) the presence of TDR seals and their location, 3) whether the seals hyperlink to additional certification information, 4) the extent to which the certification process is explained, and 5) whether audit reports are shared. Nearly three-fourths of the repository websites provide TDR status statements and put seals in one or more places; nearly 60% post audit reports and link seals to additional certification information; and over one-third explain the certification process. Directions for future research and practical application of the results are discussed. 

15.12. Regio Zum Gesamtprogramm 26.01 i4G Studie