Direkt zum Inhalt Direkt zur Suche Direkt zur Navigation

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft

Xu Chen (2008)

Indexing Consistency between Online Catalogues

Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft , Berlin.

"In the global online environment, many bibliographic services provide integrated access to different web-based OPACs. In such an environment, users expect to see more consistency within and between systems. In practice, indexers are not always consistent with each other, because subject indexing is essentially a subjective process. The purpose of this study is to investigate the indexing consistency between systems and to find out whether it is still frustrated in the new networked environment. Meanwhile, some factors which may influence indexing consistency will be examined. The most important aim of this study is to find out the reasons for inconsistencies, so that some reasonable suggestions can be made to improve indexing consistency. A sample of 3,307 monographs, i.e. 6,614 records was drawn from two Chinese bibliographic catalogues. According to Hooper¡¯s formula, the average consistency for index terms was 64.2% and for class numbers 61.6%. According to Rolling¡¯s formula, for index terms it was 70.7%, for class numbers 63.4%. Several factors affecting indexing consistency were examined: (1) exhaustivity of indexing; (2) specificity; (3) length of monographs indexed; (4) category of indexing languages; (5) subject area of monographs indexed; (6) development of disciplines; (7) structure of vocabulary; (8) year of publication. The reasons for inconsistencies were also analyzed. The analysis revealed that: (1) indexers¡¯ lack of subject knowledge, their unfamiliarity with indexing languages and indexing rules led to a lot of inconsistencies; (2) the lack of unified or detailed indexing policies brought about inconsistencies as well; (3) delayed revision of indexing languages, lack of vocabulary control, shortage of scope notes and ¡°see also¡± reference notes, and high semantic freedom by term or class choosing also caused inconsistencies."

(Quelle: edoc-Server der HU)